Muhammad v. Brown et al
| Tariq Muhammad |
| OSP Supt. Brandon Kelly, Dir. Colette Peters, Gov. Kate Brown and Oregon Dept. of Corrections |
| 6:2020cv01416 |
| August 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Karin J Immergut |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed on 10/8/2020 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 10/9/2020.) (joha)
|
| Filing 5 Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Tariq Muhammad. (joha) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court ORDERS Muhammad to submit $400.00 or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this proceeding. Signed on 8/24/2020 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Mailed order and IFP application to Pro Se party on 8/26/2020.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 8/19/2020.) (dsg) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit of Tariq Muhammad. Filed by Tariq Muhammad. (Related document(s): Complaint #1 .) (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. NO FEE, NO IFP. Filed by Tariq Muhammad against Kate Brown, Brandon Kelly, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Colette Peters. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
