Grubb v. Springfield School District
| Carron Grubb |
| Springfield School District |
| 6:2020cv01513 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12111 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines #7 . Discovery is to be completed by 2/5/2021. Dispositive Motions are due by 3/5/2021. Joint ADR Report and Pretrial Order are due 30 days following the Court's ruling on any dispositive motions. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
| Filing 8 Declaration of Caitlin Mitchell . Filed by Carron Grubb. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines #7 .) (Mitchell, Caitlin) |
| Filing 7 Joint Motion for Extension of Discovery & PTO Deadlines . Filed by Carron Grubb. (Mitchell, Caitlin) |
| Filing 6 Answer to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses. Filed by Springfield School District. (Jacobson, Rebekah) |
| Filing 5 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by Springfield School District waiver sent on 9/8/2020. Filed by Springfield School District. (Jacobson, Rebekah) Modified on 9/14/2020 to correct waiver sent date. Notice of Electronic Filing regenerated to the parties. (bd) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Springfield School District. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
|
Filing 3
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 9/2/2020 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/31/2020. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 2/1/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 2/1/2021. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (bd)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-7187402 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Carron Grubb against Springfield School District (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Mitchell, Caitlin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Grubb v. Springfield School District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Springfield School District | |
| Represented By: | Rebekah R. Jacobson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carron Grubb | |
| Represented By: | Caitlin Van Tassel Mitchell |
| Represented By: | Jennifer J. Middleton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
