Nork v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Robyn L. Nork
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 6:2020cv01987
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: John V Acosta
Referring Judge: Anna J Brown
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Notice of Attorney Substitution:Attorney Luke Moen-Johnson is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Drew L. Johnson Filed by Robyn L. Nork. (Moen-Johnson, Luke)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 12/7/2020, answer due on 4/6/2021. Service specifically made upon Renata Gowie, AUSA, U.S. Attorney's Office. (jw)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 12/10/2020. Service specifically made upon U.S. Attorney General. (jw)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 12/7/2020. Service specifically made upon Regional Chief Counsel, Social Security Administration. (jw)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta to Judge Anna J. Brown. (sss)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Summons, USM 285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint and Order to Proceed in forma pauperis forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service.) (kgc)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: GRANTING Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Signed on 11/17/2020 by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (jw)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Robyn L. Nork. (Johnson, Drew)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Robyn L. Nork against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Johnson, Drew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nork v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Renata Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robyn L. Nork
Represented By: Laurie B. Mapes
Represented By: Drew L. Johnson
Represented By: Luke Moen-Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?