Rossi v. Harrold et al
Mathew W. Rossi |
Brittani, WellPath, Sheriff Clifton Harrold, Megan and Dr. Mary E. Gabriele |
6:2021cv00153 |
January 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Marco A Hernandez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER: The application #1 is DENIED. Should Plaintiff wish to continue with this case, he may file an amended application curing the deficiency within 30 days of the date of this order. The amended application must bear the Case No. 6:21-cv-00153-HZ. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended application will result in the dismissal of this proceeding. Signed on 3/19/2021 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/22/2021.) (dsg) |
Filing 6 Notice of Change of Address. Filed by Mathew W. Rossi. (dsg) |
Filing 5 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/1/2021.) (dsg) |
Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Mathew W. Rossi. (dsg) |
Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Mathew W. Rossi against Brittani, Mary E. Gabriele, Clifton Harrold, Megan, WellPath. (dsg) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Mathew W. Rossi. (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.