Ream v. Kelley
Petitioner: Jesse L. Ream
Respondent: Brandon Kelley
Case Number: 6:2021cv00927
Filed: June 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Ann L Aiken
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Exhibits 101-154 re Answer #10 . Filed by Brandon Kelley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 101-154) (Kallstrom, Nicholas)
August 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #2 . Filed by Brandon Kelley. (Related document(s): Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #2 .) (Kallstrom, Nicholas)
August 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Response to #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 . Filed by Brandon Kelley. Petitioners brief is due by 10/18/2021. Habeas Petition is taken under advisement as of 11/2/2021. (Kallstrom, Nicholas)
July 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice of Attorney Substitution: Nicholas M. Kallstrom is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Lynn David Larsen . Filed by Brandon Kelley. (Kallstrom, Nicholas)
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of Brandon Kelley. Filed by Brandon Kelley. (Larsen, Lynn)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #2 on respondent. Answer is due by 9/10/2021. Signed on 7/12/2021 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service #2 Petition) (Order and Consent Form Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/12/2021.) (jw)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Petitioner's Application for Leave to Proceed IFP #1 is DENIED as moot. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 is DENIED with leave to renew after respondent files an Answer to the Petition. Signed on 7/12/2021 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/12/2021.) (jw)
June 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected; Receipt No. 93900 issued. (ljp)
June 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/23/2021.) (joha)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Jesse L. Ream. (joha)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State). Filed by Jesse L. Ream against Brandon Kelley. (joha)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Jesse L. Ream. (joha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ream v. Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesse L. Ream
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brandon Kelley
Represented By: Lynn David Larsen
Represented By: Nicholas M. Kallstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?