Thompson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Michael Stuart Thompson |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 6:2024cv02167 |
| December 30, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9717335 Related Document: #1 Social Security Complaint,. Filed by Michael Stuart Thompson. (Kerr, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance of Susanne Luse appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Luse, Susanne) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance of Christopher Vieira appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Vieira, Christopher) |
Filing 5
ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is Denied without prejudice. Upon reapplication, plaintiff should explain the substantial cash amount noted in item 5 on the application in light of the purported lack of cash, checking, or savings accounts as well as lack of income noted in item 4. Plaintiff shall file an amended application or otherwise pay the requisite filing fee by 1/21/2025. (gm)
|
| Filing 4 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (jw) |
|
Filing 3
Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (jw)
|
| Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Michael Stuart Thompson. (Kerr, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Plaintiff consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Filed by Michael Stuart Thompson against Commissioner Social Security Administration Social Security Answer is due by 4/29/2025. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Kerr, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thompson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Stuart Thompson | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Kerr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Susanne Luse |
| Represented By: | Christopher Vieira |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
