THOMAS v. TENNIS et al
2:2003cv06273 |
March 17, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER THAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE RAPOPORTS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AS AMENDED BY THE SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PETITIONERS AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND SUPPLEMENT TO AMENDED OBJECTIONS TO MAG ISTRATE JUDGE RAPOPORTS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE BOTH OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PRO SE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IS DENIED WITHOUT A HEARING. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT BECAUSE PETITIONER FAILS TO DEMONSTRATE EITHER THE D ENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OR THAT REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD DISAGREE WITH THIS COURTS DISPOSITION OF HIS CLAIMS, A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 3/22/09. 3/25/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(mas, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: THOMAS v. TENNIS et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.