GITTENS v. THE BASKETBALL MARKETING COMPANY, INC.
Case Number: 2:2004cv01129
Filed: March 16, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Contract: Other Office
Presiding Judge: LINDA K. CARACAPPA
Presiding Judge: EDMUND V. LUDWIG
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER AND OPINION. IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S RULING ON AND 1'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM OF WRONGFUL USE OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 12/28/2010. 12/29/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
December 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANTS FROM STATING IN FRONT OF THE JURY THAT AND 1 HAS A PERPETUAL IRREVOCABLE LICENSE, DOCKETED IN THIS ACTION AS DOC. NO. 99, AND THE RESPONSE THERETO, MOTION IS DENIED WITH SOME MODIFICATION OR EXPLANATION AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 12/10/2010.12/13/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(amas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GITTENS v. THE BASKETBALL MARKETING COMPANY, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?