SONGSTER v. BEARD et al

Case Number: 2:2004cv05916
Filed: December 20, 2004
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Philadelphia Office
Presiding Judge: TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 17, 2016 64 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED. THE PETITION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT IT CHALLENGES THE PETITIONER'S MANDATORY SENTENCE OF LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE IN LIGHT OF MILLER v. ALABAMA, 132 S. CT 2455 (2012); THE PETITIONE R'S SENTENCE IN COMMONWEALTH v. SONGSTER CP-51-CR-1102961-1987 IS VACATED; THE PEITIONER SHALL BE RESENTENCED WITHIN ONE HUNDRED TWENTY (120) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; THE TIME LIMIT WITHIN THE PETITIONER MUST BE RESENTENCED MAY BE EXTENDED UPON A SHOWING OF REASONABLE CAUSE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 8/17/16. 8/17/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd)
July 29, 2014 57 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER THAT THE CLERK SHALL DOCKET THE MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THIS DATE AND TRANSMIT IT TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ON APPEAL IN CA 12-3941. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 7/29/14. 7/29/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO LEGAL, COUNSEL, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SONGSTER v. BEARD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?