BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Case Number: 2:2005cv04160
Filed: August 3, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
Presiding Judge: RONALD L. BUCKWALTER
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER THAT ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED BY PLFF. IN HIS COMPLAINTS IN CIVIL ACTIONS NOS. 05-4160, 06-2496, 06-5408, AND 08-3369 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS IN CIVIL ACTIONS NOS. 05-4160, 06-2496, 06-5408, AND 08-3369 ARE DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL STATISTICALLY CLOSE CIVIL ACTIONS NOS. 05-4160, 06-2496, 06-5408, AND 08-3369; PLFF. IS ENJOINED FROM INSTITUTING ANY NEW PRO SE CIVIL SUITS IN THIS COURT, UNDER ANY NAME PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED IN THIS OPINION OR ANY OTHER NAME THAT PLFF. MAY USE IN THE FUTURE, WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION OF ANY JUDGE OF THIS COURT; AND ANY REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO FILE A COMPLAINT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY: A COPY OF THE PROPOSED COMPLAINT, A COPY OF THIS OPINION AND ORDER, AND A STATEMENT LISTING THE TITLES AND DOCKET NUMBERS OF ALL PREVIOUS LAWSUITS, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/14/09. 4/15/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?