WOOD v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al

Case Number: 2:2006cv03033
Filed: July 11, 2006
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
Presiding Judge: STEWART DALZELL
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 13, 2009 43 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DR. STEPHEN POWERS'S MOTION TO AMEND HIS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION IS GRANTED. DR STEPHEN POWERS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DR ROBERT DOE'S MOTION IS GRANTED. THE MOTION FILED BY LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN VINCENT GUARINI, TROY WALTZ, AND JAMES FLAHERTY IS GRANTED IN PART. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN VINCENT GUARINI, AND TROY WALTZ ARE DISMISSED. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THAT MOTION IS DENIED. BY JANUARY 20/09, THE REMAINING PARTI ES SHALL JOINTLY REPORT BY FAX (215-580-2156) TO CHAMBERS WHETHER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE FRUITFUL. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT LANCASTER COUNTY, ROBERT DOE, STEPHEN POWERS, TROY WALTZ, VINCENT GUARINI AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF CURTIS WOOD WITH EACH SIDE TO BEAR ITS OWN COSTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 1/13/09. 1/13/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(lisad, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WOOD v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?