NORTH JACKSON PHARMACY, INC. et al v. CAREMARK RX INC. et al
2:2006cv04305 |
September 27, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
JOHN P. FULLAM |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF BRADY ENTERPRISES,INC.'S REVISED AND AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (03-CV-4730, DOC. NO. 77) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF NORTH JACKSON PHARMACY INC.'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (06-CV-43 05, DOC. NO. 67 AND 06-MD-1782, DOC. NOS. 180, 248) ARE DENIED. DEFENDANTS CAREMARK RX, INC. AND CAREMARK INC.'S DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS' EXPERT TESTIMONY (06-CV-4305, DOC. NO. 77 AND 06-MD-1782, DOC. NO. 259) IS GRANTED. DEFEN DANTS EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.'S MOTION TO DECERTIFY PLAINTIFFS' CLASS (06-CV-4114, DOC. NO. 2 AND 06-MD-1782, DOC. NO. 22) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 1/18/2017. 1/18/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (SEE PAPER # 283 IN 06-MD-1782) (ems) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: NORTH JACKSON PHARMACY, INC. et al v. CAREMARK RX INC. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.