STANFORD v. FOAMEX LP et al
Plaintiff: WILLIAM STANFORD, JR.
Defendant: FOAMEX LP, FOAMEX LP BENEFITS COMMITTEE, UNKNOWN FIDUCIARY DEFENDANTS and FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST CO.
Case Number: 2:2007cv04225
Filed: October 9, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER THAT PLFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF THE COMMITTEE DEFTS & FIDELITY ARE GRANTED & JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST PLFFS & IN FAVOR OF THE COMMITTEE DEFTS, FOAMEX L.P. & FIDELITY MAN AGEMENT TRUST CO. ON DEFTS' COUNTERCLAIMS; & PARAGRAPH 10 OF AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE FOAMEX L.P. SAVINGS PLAN IS REFORMED TO ELIMINATE THE WORDS "OR OUT OF" FROM THE SENTENCE "EFFECTIVE 7/20/2005, A MEMBER MAY NO LONGER DIRECT NEW INVESTMENTS INTO, OR TRANSFER EXISTING INVESTMENTS INTO OR OUT OF, THE FOAMEX STOCK FUND." SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 8/31/10. 9/1/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )
September 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 99 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 9/24/09. 9/25/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )
April 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER THAT DEFTS' REQUEST THAT THE COURT EXTEND THE STAY IS DENIED. THE ACTION SHALL PROCEED AGAINST THE REMAINING NON-BANKRUPT DEFTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 4/15/09. 4/16/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(kw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STANFORD v. FOAMEX LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM STANFORD, JR.
Represented By: CHARLES H. THULIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FOAMEX LP
Represented By: MICHAEL PAUL MONACO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FOAMEX LP BENEFITS COMMITTEE
Represented By: MICHAEL PAUL MONACO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN FIDUCIARY DEFENDANTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST CO.
Represented By: SHERYL D. WILLERT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?