AMES v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: RACHELLE AMES
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2007cv05420
Filed: December 24, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: PETRESE B. TUCKER
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS HEREBY APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIE IS DENIED; AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 5/4/09. 5/6/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(fdc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AMES v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RACHELLE AMES
Represented By: SHARON GORNSTEIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?