LONG v. ASTRUE

LONG v. ASTRUE

Plaintiff:	SYLVIA D. LONG
Defendant:	MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number:	2:2008cv01787
Filed:	April 16, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	LOUIS H. POLLAK
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 2, 2010	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION INSUPPORT OF REVIEW (DOC. NO.9) IS GRANTED; ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED REVERSING THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND REMANDING THE MATTER TO THE COMMISSIONER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 7/30/2010. 8/2/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kk, )
December 22, 2009	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND OPINIION ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED IN PART AND NOT APPROVED AND NOT ADOPTED IN PART. THE COMMISSIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; AND THE M ATTER IS REMAND TO JUDGE SITARSKI'S FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ADDRESSING (a) PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR, AND (b) WHETHER SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN A FULLY DEVELOPED RECORD DICTATES A FINDING THAT PLAINTIFF IS DISABLED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 12/21/09. 12/23/09 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 2, 2010

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION INSUPPORT OF REVIEW (DOC. NO.9) IS GRANTED; ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED REVERSING THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND REMANDING THE MATTER TO THE COMMISSIONER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 7/30/2010. 8/2/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kk, )

December 22, 2009

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND OPINIION ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED IN PART AND NOT APPROVED AND NOT ADOPTED IN PART. THE COMMISSIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; AND THE M ATTER IS REMAND TO JUDGE SITARSKI'S FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ADDRESSING (a) PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR, AND (b) WHETHER SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN A FULLY DEVELOPED RECORD DICTATES A FINDING THAT PLAINTIFF IS DISABLED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 12/21/09. 12/23/09 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LONG v. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: SYLVIA D. LONG
Represented By:	ERIC J. FISCHER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?