MARABLE v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: JAMES MARABLE
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2008cv05447
Filed: November 18, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: PETRESE B. TUCKER
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 15:1601 Truth in Lending

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THIS ACTION IS REMANDED PURSUANT TO SENTENCE SIX OF 42 U.S.C. &405 (g) IN LIGHT OF THE NEW AND MATERIAL EVIDENCE THAT MUST BE CONSIDERED BY THE ALJ; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOWELL A. REED, JR ON 12/10/09. 12/10/09 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MARABLE v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES MARABLE
Represented By: JOHN S. WHITELAW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?