MCCARTHY v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: PAMELA A. MCCARTHY
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2009cv00229
Filed: January 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Butler
Presiding Judge: NORMA L. SHAPIRO
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AND PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 2/23/2010. 3/1/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCCARTHY v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PAMELA A. MCCARTHY
Represented By: THOMAS D. SUTTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?