WALTHOUR v. HERRON
Plaintiff: VICTOR WALTHOUR, SR.
Defendant: JON HERRON
Case Number: 2:2010cv01495
Filed: April 5, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
Presiding Judge: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED, THIS CASE IS DISMISSED, & ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/6/10. 5/6/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF.(kw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WALTHOUR v. HERRON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VICTOR WALTHOUR, SR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JON HERRON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?