JUDGE v. PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLETS et al
| JACK JUDGE , JR. |
| PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLETS, CHELSEA LIMERICK HOLDINGS, LLC, CHELSEA PROPERTY GROUP, INC., SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., ANN TAYLOR STORES CORP., ANN TAYLOR LOFT OUTLET STORE 2909 PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLET, ABM INC BUILDING MAINTENTANCE and HGO INC BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICES |
| 2:2010cv01553 |
| April 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| RONALD L. BUCKWALTER |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION BY DEFT, ABM MID-ATLANTIC, INC., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #42) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 3/15/2012; 3/15/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION BY DEFENDANT ABM-MID-ATLANTIC, INC. TO DISMISS COUNT IV OF THE CROSSCLAIM (DOC. #8) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 6/14/2010. 6/15/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(tomg, )
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF JACK JUDGE, JR.'S MOTION FOR REMAND (DOC. #9) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 6/8/2010. 6/9/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(tomg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
