LYNCH v. RAMSEY et al
ANTHONY LYNCH |
CHARLES RAMSEY, JOHN GAITTENS, ROBERT SNYDER, JOHN GALLAGHER, JOSEPH O'DONNELL, CHESTER O'NEILL and JOSEPH GOSSNER |
2:2010cv03436 |
July 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
JOHN R. PADOVA |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE SATEMENT ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SELF PRESERVATION CLAIM IS GRANTED AND THE CLAIM IS D ISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S DUE PROCESS CLAIM ARISING FROM THE SEIZURE OF HIS FIREARMS IS GRANTED AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S DUE PROCESS CLAIMS ARISING FROM HIS 2008 SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION AND 2010 SUSPENSION IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST JOHN GALLAGHER, JOSEPH O'DONNELL, AND ROBERT SNYDER IS GRANTED, THESE CLAIMS AR E DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY AND GALLAGHER, O'DONNELL, AND SNYDER ARE DISMISSED AS DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF MAY FILE ONE AMENDED COMPLAINT, WHICH MUST BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FOR THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 11/4/2010. 11/5/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jcab) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.