MONROE v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
Plaintiff: EDWARD MONROE
Defendant: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THOMAS DOHMAN, KARANZAN, MCGREGORY and HAYES
Case Number: 2:2010cv03798
Filed: July 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: THOMAS N. ONEILL
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION IS GRANTED AND; PLFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST DIGUGLIELMO ARE DISMISSED; COUNT I OF PLFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED; AND COUNT II OF PLFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLFF IS PERMITTED TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT ASSERTING A CLAIM OF RETAILIATION AGAINST DOHMAN ON OR BEFORE 2/18/14. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 1/30/14. 1/31/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fb)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY DEFENDANTS DIGUGLIELMO, DOHMAN, KARAZAN, MCGREGORY, BRIGHT AND HAYES (DOC. NO. 22) IS GRANTED IN PART AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST HAYES AND JOHN DOE #7 ARE DIS MISSED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT DIGUGLIELMO ARE DISMISSED. COUNT I OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT ALLEGING VIOLATION OF HIS RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE COURTS IS DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. COUNT II ALLEGING RETAILIATION IS DISMISSED TO THE EXT ENT THAT IT ASSERTS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS DIGUGLIELMO, KARAZAN, MCGREGORY BRIGHT HARGROVE ABD JOHN DOES 1-6. PLAINTFF IS PERMITTED TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY 8/23/13, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/31/13. 8/1/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MONROE v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDWARD MONROE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS DOHMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KARANZAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MCGREGORY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HAYES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?