MASHBURN et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
| JAMES L MASHBURN, SR. and FRANCES V MASHBURN |
| ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY, GAF CORPORATION, H.K. PORTER COMPANY, THE MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP., OWENS-ILLINIOS, INC., W. R. GRACE, INC., FLEXITALLIC GASKET COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, CHRYSLER CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR CO. and GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION |
| 2:2010cv80181 |
| September 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER THAT THE COURT'S ORDERS DISMISSING THE CASES LISTED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION ARE VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CASES BE TRANSFERRED TO THE "BANKRUPTCY ONLY" DOCKET. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CASES LISTED IN EXHIBIT "A" REMAIN CLOSED SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 8/16/2011. 8/17/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(jcab)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER THAT THE CASES LISTED IN EXHIBIT "A," ATTACHED, ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 1/26/2011. 2/1/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED. (aeg, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDERED THAT THE CASES LISTED IN EXHIBIT "A", ATTACHED, A STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD IN THE CASES LISTED IN EXHIBIT "A", ATTACHED, ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 25TH AT 2:00PM IN COURTROOM 11A, UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE, 601 MARKET STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106. (SEE 10-MD-875 PAPER NO. 7560 FOR CASE LIST). SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 12/16/10. 12/20/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 12/3/2010. 12/6/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (SEE #7546 IN 01-MDL-875)(jcab)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT, WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS, EACH INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE ONE SEVERED AND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS COURT. THE CLERK OF THIS COURT IS DIRECTED TO ASSIGN CIVIL ACTION NUMBERS TO EACH INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFF. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION OF THE INSTANT ORDER MAY RESULT, UPON MOTION BY ANY CONCERNED DEFENDANT OR BY RULE TO SHOW CAUSE ISSUED BY THE COURT, IN THE DISMISSAL OF THAT SPECIFIC PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(B), ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO. ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (nds, )
|
| Filing 4 DOCKET ENTRIES FILED IN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI (jaa, ) Modified on 9/2/2010 (jaa, ). Modified on 9/8/2010 (td, ). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL (jaa, ) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 11 THAT THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING PROCEDURES FOR THE PROCESSING OF CASES, DOCKETS, PLEADINGS AND ORDERS IN MDL 875 CASES ARE ADOPTED AS OUTLINED IN THIS ORDER, ETC. ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 1 TRANSFER ORDER NO. 832 THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS ORDERED TO INITIATE THE PROCEDURES FOR THE TRANSFER OF MDL 875 CASES FROM THE U.S.D.C. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS COURT'S ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 11. ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jaa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
