GOODE et al v. LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC.
KEESHA GOODE and VICTORIA GOODMAN |
LEXISNEXIS RISK & INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. |
2:2011cv02950 |
May 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
JAN E. DUBOIS |
Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT AN INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE WILL BE SCHEDULED IN DUE COURSE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 6/25/12. 6/26/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.[FDC] |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT PART OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THAT SEEKS DISMISSAL OF COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT IS DENIED. HOWEVER, RECOVERY UNDER COUN T I IS LIMITED TO ACTUAL DAMAGES, COSTS, AND ATTORNEY'S FEES UNDER 15 USC SECTION 1681o(a). 2. THAT PART OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THAT SEEKS DISMISSAL OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF A WILLFUL VIOLATION OF 15 USC SECTION 1681b(b)(3)(A) IN COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COURT WILL CONDUCT A TELEPHONE CONFERENCE TO SCHEDULE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN DUE COURSE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 3/22/12. 3/23/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.