ROUTES 202 AND 309 AND NOVELTIES GIFTS, INC. v. THE KINGS MEN et al
| ROUTES 202 AND 309 AND NOVELTIES GIFTS, INC. |
| THE KINGS MEN, MARK HOUCK, DAMIAN WARGO, DAVID DINUZZO, SR, DESARAE MCDONNELL, JOHN A. MCGANN, 3RD, ROBERT LECHTER, CHARLES JOHN HARVEY, PHILLIP GRECO and JOHN DOES 1-100 |
| 2:2011cv05822 |
| September 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| PETRESE B. TUCKER |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIM (DOC. NO.75) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO.53) AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO .52) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANT'S USE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY (DOC. NO.65) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR 3/13/2014 AT 02:00 PM BEFORE CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 3/7/2014. 3/7/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (kk, )
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION (DOC. #2) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 10/14/2011. 10/25/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(tomg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
