SUTTON v. DELANEY et al
| OLAF SUTTON |
| DELANEY, PHYLLIS TAYLOR, WILL FLAHERTY, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES and POTE |
| 2:2011cv07005 |
| November 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| EDUARDO C. ROBRENO |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 5/29/14. 5/30/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, LEGAL.(lvj, ) Modified on 5/30/2014 (lvj, ).
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER THAT PLFF'S CLAIMS FOR INJUNCTIVE OR DECLARATORY RELIEF ARE MOOT; ARAMARK DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 59) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS SSET FORTH BELOW; DEFT'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLFF'S CLAIM S UNDER THE 1ST AMENDMENT AND RLUIPA; DEFT'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLFF'S EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE CLAIM AGAINST FLAHERTY IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; DEFT'S MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PLFF'S CLAIMS UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE AS TO ARAMARK AND FLAHERTY IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 5/20/14. 5/22/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY PLACED IN THE LEGAL BIN. (pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
