GARCIA et al v. 2011 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION et al

Plaintiff: JOE GARCIA, FERNANDO QUILES and DALIA RIVERA MATIAS
Defendant: 2011 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION and CAROL AICHELE
Case Number: 2:2012cv00556
Filed: February 2, 2012
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: R. BARCLAY SURRICK
Nature of Suit: Voting
Cause of Action: 42:1971
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 8, 2013 71 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS DENIED; PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO CONVENE A THREE-JUDGE PANEL IS DENIED; PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION IS DENIED; DEFENDANT 2011 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMITTEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT CAROL AICHELE'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT ARE GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 4/5/2013. 4/8/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED; AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(md)
February 8, 2012 11 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS SENATOR DOMINIC PILEGGI, REPRESENTATIVE MICHAEL TURZAI AND LOUIS B. KUPPERMAN'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR CONVENING OF A THREE-JUDGE PANEL IS DENIED; PLAINTIFFS JOE GARCIA, FER NANDO QUILES AND DALIA RIVERA MATIA'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR CONVENING OF A THREE-JUDGE PANEL IS DENIED; AND PLAINTIFF SAMUEL H. SMITH'S MOTION TO CONVENE A THREE-JUDGE PANEL IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/8/2012; 2/8/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(tomg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GARCIA et al v. 2011 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOE GARCIA
Represented By: JOSE LUIS ONGAY
Represented By: JUAN CARTAGENA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FERNANDO QUILES
Represented By: JOSE LUIS ONGAY
Represented By: JUAN CARTAGENA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DALIA RIVERA MATIAS
Represented By: JUAN CARTAGENA
Represented By: JOSE LUIS ONGAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 2011 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION
Represented By: BRYAN DEVINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAROL AICHELE
Represented By: JOEL L. FRANK
Represented By: WILLIAM H. LAMB
Represented By: STEVEN V. TURNER
Represented By: SCOT RUSSEL WITHERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?