CARDIONET, INC. v. MEDNET HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
Plaintiff: CARDIONET, INC.
Defendant: MEDNET HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MEDTEL 24, INC., RYTHYMWATCH LLC and AMI CARDIAC MONITORING, INC.
Case Number: 2:2012cv02517
Filed: May 8, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: JUAN R. SANCHEZ
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 389 ORDER THAT CARDIONET'S MOTION FOR A FINDING OF CONTEMPT OF THE CONSENT JUDGMENT BY MEDTEL 24, INC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS IS GRANTED IN PART. CARDIONET'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS UNDER RULE 11 AND 28 U.S.C. & 1927 IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 11/23/15. 11/23/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jl, )
July 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 333 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT MED TEL 24, INC.'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM CONSENT JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/22/15. 7/22/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jl, )
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES' DISPUTES REGARDING THE CLAIM TERMS SUBMITTED FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE RESOLVED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 11/15/2013. 11/15/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CARDIONET, INC. v. MEDNET HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CARDIONET, INC.
Represented By: BRADFORD J. BADKE
Represented By: ALEXANDRA O. FELLOWES
Represented By: CHING-LEE FUKUDA
Represented By: JOHN W. GOLDSCHMIDT, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEDNET HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Represented By: CHRISTOPHER H. BLASZKOWSKI
Represented By: ANDREW KOOPMAN
Represented By: BENJAMIN E. LEACE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEDTEL 24, INC.
Represented By: BENJAMIN E. LEACE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RYTHYMWATCH LLC
Represented By: BENJAMIN E. LEACE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMI CARDIAC MONITORING, INC.
Represented By: MATTHEW I. COHEN
Represented By: JOSEPH J. HAMILL, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?