TRELZENBERG v. AIG

TRELZENBERG v. AIG

Plaintiff:	KATHERINE TRELZENBERG
Defendant:	AIG
Case Number:	2:2012cv03603
Filed:	June 27, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge:	THOMAS N. ONEILL
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 24, 2014	Filing 38 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. COUNTS I AND II OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED. ON OR BEFORE 5/19/2014, DEFENDANT 21ST CENTURY INSURANCE SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT SHALL ALSO AGREE UPON A DISCOVERY SCHEDULE AND SUBMIT SAME TO THE COURT FOR APPROVAL.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 4/24/2014. 4/24/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
July 30, 2013	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT IT SEEKS TO DISMISS COUNTS I AND III OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT. COUNTS I AND III OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED. DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS II AND IV OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF IS PERMITTED TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ALLEGING FACTS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT HER DISMISSED CLAIMS ON OR BEFORE 8/19/2013. THIS CASE IS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE FOR ALL PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/30/2013. 7/30/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )

Date Filed

Document Text

April 24, 2014

Filing 38 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. COUNTS I AND II OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED. ON OR BEFORE 5/19/2014, DEFENDANT 21ST CENTURY INSURANCE SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT SHALL ALSO AGREE UPON A DISCOVERY SCHEDULE AND SUBMIT SAME TO THE COURT FOR APPROVAL.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 4/24/2014. 4/24/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

July 30, 2013

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT IT SEEKS TO DISMISS COUNTS I AND III OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT. COUNTS I AND III OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED. DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS II AND IV OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF IS PERMITTED TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ALLEGING FACTS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT HER DISMISSED CLAIMS ON OR BEFORE 8/19/2013. THIS CASE IS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE FOR ALL PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/30/2013. 7/30/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TRELZENBERG v. AIG
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KATHERINE TRELZENBERG
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: AIG
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?