ANDERSON v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: PATRICIA A. ANDERSON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2012cv04114
Filed: July 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: THOMAS N. ONEILL
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED; AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER REVIEW CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 4/3/13. 4/3/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANDERSON v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRICIA A. ANDERSON
Represented By: MICHAEL PATRICK BOYLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?