TAYLOR v. CAMERON

Petitioner: KEVIN TAYLOR
Respondent: KENNETH CAMERON
Case Number: 2:2013cv01262
Filed: March 8, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: PAUL S. DIAMOND
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 17, 2015 38 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER THAT THE REPORT IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK SHALL PLACE THIS MATTER IN CIVIL SUSPENSE AND SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 3/13/15. 3/17/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, ) Modified on 3/17/2015 (jaa, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TAYLOR v. CAMERON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KEVIN TAYLOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KENNETH CAMERON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.