FRENKEL v. WEBSTER et al
Plaintiff: LEON FRENKEL
Defendant: DAVID WEBSTER, ESQ.
Case Number: 2:2013cv05880
Filed: October 4, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: BERLE M. SCHILLER
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER AND JUDGMENT. ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. ON COUNT VI, FINAL JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF LEON FRENKEL AND AGAINST KENNETH BAKER IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,000, REPRESENTING THE LOST FRENKEL FUNDS, AS WELL AS $78.082.19 IN INTEREST PLUS $102.74 PER DIEM. ON COUNT XIV, FINAL JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF LEON FRENKEL AND AGAINST KENNETH BAKER IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,000, REPRESENTING THE LOST SUGAR DEPOSIT, AS WELL AS $56,383.56 IN INTEREST PLUS $82.19 PER DIEM. ON COUNTS VI AND XIV, KENNETH BAKER IS FURTHER LIABLE FOR $23,140 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES AND $92.70 IN LITIGATION COSTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 4/14/15. 4/15/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES MAILED TO WEBSTER, LABRIE, FITZGERALD ENTERPRISES AT ADDRESSES OF NY AND FL. (fdc)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING UNDER RULE 60(B) FILED BY DEFENDANTS [#69] IS DENIED. ADDITIONALLY, IN LIGHT OF THE COURT'S RECENT DECISION TO ALLOW DEFENDANT KENNETH BAKER TO AMEND HIS ANSWER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#71] IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 1/13/15. ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES MAILED TO LABRIE, FITZGERALD ENTERPRISES AT ADDRESSES OF NY AND FL. (fdc)
November 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE COURT DENIES DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST BAKER ON COUNTS I,II,VI,VIII,IX,X,XI,XIV,XV, AND XVI. THE COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST WEBSTER ON COUNTS I,II,V,VII,VIII, AND IX. THE COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST B AKER ENTERPRISES ON COUNTS I,II,VI,VIII,IX,X,XI,XIV,XV, AND XVI. THE COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST BAKER GROUP ON COUNTS I,II,VIII,IX,X,XI,XV, AND XVI. THE COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST NEW LIFE CHURCH ON COUNTS X,XI,XV, AND XVI AND D ISMISSES NEW LIFE CHURCH FROM COUNTS I,II,VIII, AND IX. THE COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST FITZGERALD ON COUNTS I,II,VIII, AND IX. THE COURT DISMISSES KLEIN FROM COUNTS I,II,VIII, AND IX. THE COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST KUMAR ON COUN TS I,VIII, AND IX. THE COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST E-TITLE ON COUNTS I,VIII, AND IX. THE COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST KING ON COUNTS X,XI,XV, AND XVI. THE COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST FOUR KINGS ON COUNTS X,XI,XV, AND XVI. ON COUNTS I,II,V,VI,VII,VIII, AND IX, WEBSTER, BAKER ENTERPRISES, BAKER GROUP, FITZGERALD, KUMAR, AND E-TITLE ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR DAMAGES OF $250,000, REPRESENTING THE LOST FRENKEL FUNDS. ON COUNT VI, BAKER ENTERPRISES IS ADDIT IONALLY LIABLE FOR $61,541.10 IN INTEREST PLUS $102.74 PER DIEM. ON COUNTS X,XI,XIV,XV, AND XVI, BAKER ENTERPRISES, BAKER GROUP, NEW LIFE CHURCH, KING, AND FOUR KINGS ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR $250,000 IN DAMAGES, REPRESENTI NG THE LOST SUGAR DEPOSIT. ON COUNT XIV, BAKER ENTERPRISES IS ADDITIONALLY LIABLE FOR $43,150.68 IN INTEREST PLUS $82.19 PER DIEM. ON COUNTS VI AND XIV, BAKER ENTERPRISES IS FURTHER LIABLE FOR $11,515 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES AND $92.70 IN LITIGATION COSTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 11/4/14. 11/5/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FRENKEL v. WEBSTER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEON FRENKEL
Represented By: MAURICE R. MITTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID WEBSTER, ESQ.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?