PATEL v. TEPOX-VASQUEZ
INDU PATEL |
CARLOS TEPOX-VASQUEZ |
2:2014cv02271 |
April 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Bucks |
R. BARCLAY SURRICK |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFF FROM RECOVERING EXCESS MEDICAL EXPENSES (DOC. 24) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS PRECLUDED FROM PRESENTING A CLAIM FOR EXCESS MEDICAL BENEFITS AT TRIAL.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 8/3/15. 8/4/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PATEL v. TEPOX-VASQUEZ | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: INDU PATEL | |
Represented By: | MARC I. SIMON |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CARLOS TEPOX-VASQUEZ | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.