PATEL v. TEPOX-VASQUEZ
Plaintiff: INDU PATEL
Defendant: CARLOS TEPOX-VASQUEZ
Case Number: 2:2014cv02271
Filed: April 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Bucks
Presiding Judge: R. BARCLAY SURRICK
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFF FROM RECOVERING EXCESS MEDICAL EXPENSES (DOC. 24) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS PRECLUDED FROM PRESENTING A CLAIM FOR EXCESS MEDICAL BENEFITS AT TRIAL.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 8/3/15. 8/4/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PATEL v. TEPOX-VASQUEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: INDU PATEL
Represented By: MARC I. SIMON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARLOS TEPOX-VASQUEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?