TANKSLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Plaintiff: CLAYTON TANKSLEY
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Case Number: 2:2014cv05751
Filed: October 9, 2014
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 18, 2015 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER THAT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN THIS CASE IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 6/18/15. 6/18/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TANKSLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CLAYTON TANKSLEY
Represented By: ROBERT A. PETRUZZELLI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?