ALMEIDA et al v. LE et al
| NATISHA ALMEIDA and BRUCE ROBINSON |
| TUAN A. LE and DOYLESTOWN WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER |
| 2:2014cv06674 |
| November 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Bucks |
| ROBERT F. KELLY |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE POST-TRIAL MOTION FOR REMITTITUR, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, A NEW TRIAL ON DAMAGES BY DEFENDANTS TUAN A. LE, M.D. AND DOYLESTOWN WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER 123 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE POST-TRIAL MOTION IS DE NIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE UNOPPOSED PETITION FOR DELAY DAMAGES OF PLAINTIFF, NATISHA ALMEIDA, PURSUANT TO PA R.C.P. 238 118 IS GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED THAT THE VERDICT OF THE JURY RENDERED ON 3/17/2017, AND ENTERED BY THIS HON ORABLE COURT INTO JUDGMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF SIX HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($625,000.00) ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, TUAN A. LE, M.D., AND DOYLESTOWN WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, LLC, BE MOLDED TO REFLECT THE ADDIT ION OF DELAY DAMAGES IN THE SUM OF THIRTY SIX THOUSAND, NINE HUNDRED NINETY NINE DOLLARS AND THIRTEEN CENTS ($36,999.13) FOR A TOTAL VERDICT OF SIX HUNDRED AND SIXTY ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND NINETY NINE DOLLARS AND THIRTEEN CENTS ($661,999.13). SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 5/9/17. 5/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
