SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA v. POST et al
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA |
JOHN POST and MARISSA POST |
JOHN POST and MARISSA POST |
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA |
2:2015cv04501 |
August 11, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON |
Civil Rights: Education |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER THAT THE DISTRICTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF 54 ) IS GRANTED AS TO PARENTS COUNTERCLAIMS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE HEARING OFFICERS ORDER AND RETALIATION. IT IS OTHERWISE DENIED. PARENTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RE CORD (ECF 62 ) IS DENIED EXCEPT AS TO THE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF ROBERTA BENJAMIN AND PARAGRAPHS 26-27 OF THE DECLARATION OF MARISSA POST. THE DISTRICTS MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF 59 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT, BECAUSE ALL ARGUMENTS THEREIN ARE ADDRESSED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM AND IN THE PORTION OF THIS ORDER DECIDING PARENTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/23/17. 8/24/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, ) |
Filing 68 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION (DOC. NO. 53 ) IS DENIED AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION (DOC. NO. 50 ) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/5/2017. 7/5/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.