BROWER v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
| PHILLIP BROWER |
| PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA MUNICPAL CORPORATION, U.SA CORPARATION, AMINA, P.A. PANTAL and LOUIS GIORLA |
| 2:2015cv05039 |
| September 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| GERALD J. PAPPERT |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 32) IS DENIED AS TO JEAN PANTAL, DEANNA PETWAY, AND DR. BRUCE BALTT; GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH SSERVICES, AND GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO ELMEADA FRIAS AND SEAN DECKER; PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A SECIND AMENDED COMPLAINT AS TO FRIAS AND DECKER ON OR BEFORE 10/20/16. IF HE FAILS TO DO SO THE CLAIMS AGAINST FRIAS AND DECKER WILL BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 9/20/16. 9/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 14, 15, 20) AND PLAINTIFF'S LETTER (DOC. NO. 16) ARE GRANTED. BROWER'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AND THE COURT GRANTS BROWER LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAIN T ON OR BEFORE 7/1/16. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 5/4/16. 5/4/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
