LAUGHTON v. BEST LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff: ANDREA LAUGHTON
Defendant: BEST LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
Case Number: 2:2015cv06622
Filed: December 15, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 2/6/17. 2/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LAUGHTON v. BEST LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANDREA LAUGHTON
Represented By: SIDNEY L. GOLD
Represented By: WILLIAM RIESER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BEST LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: DAVID M. HOLLAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?