TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and CEPHALON, INC. |
UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. |
VISTA HEALTHPLAN, INC. and JEFFREY R. KRINSK |
PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND, DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN and SHIRLEY PANEBIANO |
2:2016cv04870 |
September 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Montgomery |
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 210 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT IS BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 9/18/18. 9/19/18 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc, ) |
Filing 190 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION BY PLAINTIFFS TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., ET. AL. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 136 IS GRANTED AND THAT THE 12/7/15 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, BY ITS PLAIN LANGUAGE, IS A BINDING, ENFORCEABLE, AND UNAMBIGUOUS CONTRACT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 4/20/18. 4/20/18 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.