STATE BANK & TRUST CO. v. PHILLY WHOLESALE, LLC et al
STATE BANK & TRUST CO. |
PHILLY WHOLESALE, LLC, SAURABH KAMRA, MALWA INVESTORS GROUP, INC. and HARPINDER SINGH |
2:2016cv05508 |
October 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Delaware |
GERALD J. PAPPERT |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION (DOC. NO. 16 ), IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION (DOC. NO. 6 ), IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST MALWA INVESTORS ON COUNT TWO AND HARPINDER SINGH ON COUNT FOUR IN FAVOR OF STATE BANK & TRUST CO., AND MALWA INVESTORS AND HARPINDER SINGH ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR A SUM OF $69,679.92 AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 9/22/2017. 9/22/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 5 ), IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST PHILLY WHOLESALE ON COUNT ONE AND AGAINST SAURABH KAMRA ON COUNT THREE IN FAVOR OF STATE BANK & TRUST CO. D/B/A PATRIOT CAPITAL , AND PHILLY WHOLESALE AND SAURABH KAMRA ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR A SUM OF $115,523.48, COMPOSED OF $103,844.38 IN DAMAGES AND $11,679.10 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/2/2017. 8/2/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.