SHIFFLETT v. KORSZNIAK et al
| PAUL SHIFFLETT |
| KORSZNIAK, CHRISTIAN, GOLSORKHI, BURKHOLDER, BIANCO, PAMELA ROEHM and JOSEPH P. MULLIGAN |
| 2:2016cv06537 |
| December 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY DR. RONALD BURKHOLDER IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT RONALD BURKHOLDER AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF PAUL SHIFFLETT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 11/17/22. 11/17/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY DR. MUHAMMAD GOLSORKSKI AND DR. FERDINAD CHRISTIAN IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS DR. MUHAMMAD GOLSORKHI AND DR. FERDINAND CHRISTIAN AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF PAUL SHIFFLETT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 11/8/22. 11/8/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS ARE GRANTED AND THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 7/12/17. 7/13/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED. (jpd )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
