ANDREWS v. KNIGHT et al
| GERALD ANDREWS |
| KNIGHT, FREDRICKS, SEAGRAVES, HOBER, YOUNG and WALKER |
| 2:2017cv00962 |
| March 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Huntingdon |
| C. DARNELL JONES |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS 91 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT I OF PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH RESPECT TO INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS GIORLA, DOTSON, MARTIN AND LOVE; DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT II AGAINST DEFENDANTS GIORLA AND DOTSON BUT DENIED AS TO DEFENDANTS KNIGHT, MARTIN AND LOVE; DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS III AND IV AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS; DEFENDANTS CITY AND GIORLAS MOTION IS DENIED AS TO COUNT V; THE PARTIES SHALL CONTACT MAGIST RATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI TO SCHEDULE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TO BE HELD WITHIN FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; AND, WITHIN TWO (2) WEEKS OF THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, THE PARTIES SHALL PROVIDE THIS COURT WITH A JOINTLY PREPARED WRITTEN STATUS REPORT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 11/7/22. 11/9/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 7/1/22. 7/1/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
