IRVING v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District IRVING v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

IRVING v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Plaintiff:	KEVIN IRVING
Defendant:	STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number:	2:2017cv01124
Filed:	March 13, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	JOEL H. SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 30, 2018	Filing 23 OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS OF BAD FAITH FROM THE COMPLAINT, IS DENIED. DEFENDANT HAS TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IN WHICH TO FILE AN ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 1/29/2018. 1/30/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
October 4, 2017	Filing 11 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS OF BAD FAITH FROM THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) (DOC. 5 ) (COUNT II) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS GIVEN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMEN DED COMPLAINT. DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO RESPOND TO AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF PLAINTIFF FILING AN AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, SHOULD PLAINTIFF ELECT NOT TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITHIN FORTY-FOUR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM IN COURT I. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/4/2017. 10/4/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 30, 2018

Filing 23 OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS OF BAD FAITH FROM THE COMPLAINT, IS DENIED. DEFENDANT HAS TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IN WHICH TO FILE AN ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 1/29/2018. 1/30/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

October 4, 2017

Filing 11 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS OF BAD FAITH FROM THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) (DOC. 5 ) (COUNT II) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS GIVEN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMEN DED COMPLAINT. DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO RESPOND TO AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF PLAINTIFF FILING AN AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, SHOULD PLAINTIFF ELECT NOT TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITHIN FORTY-FOUR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM IN COURT I. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/4/2017. 10/4/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IRVING v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KEVIN IRVING
Represented By:	AGOSTINO CAMMISA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By:	LORI C. MILLER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?