SATELL v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY

SATELL v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY

Plaintiff:	STEPHEN SATELL
Defendant:	TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
Case Number:	2:2017cv02774
Filed:	June 19, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	MARK A. KEARNEY
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 3, 2018	Filing 44 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 32 , IS GRANTED AS THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT OF FEDERAL LAW PRECLUDING JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANT'S FAVOR DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFF'S DUE PROCESS AND UNTIMELY RACE DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/3/18. 1/3/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
July 25, 2017	Filing 9 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S 3 MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. WE GRANT THE MOTION AS TO THE BREACH OF CONTRACT AND DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS CLAIMS BUT GIVE PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, ON OR BEFORE 8/4/20 17; WE DENY THE MOTION AS TO THE TILE VI CLAIM; AND, ABSENT PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER PARAGRAPH 1, DEFENDANT SHALL FILE AN ANSWER ON OR BEFORE 8/8/2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 7/25/17. 7/25/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 3, 2018

Filing 44 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 32 , IS GRANTED AS THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT OF FEDERAL LAW PRECLUDING JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANT'S FAVOR DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFF'S DUE PROCESS AND UNTIMELY RACE DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/3/18. 1/3/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

July 25, 2017

Filing 9 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S 3 MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. WE GRANT THE MOTION AS TO THE BREACH OF CONTRACT AND DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS CLAIMS BUT GIVE PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, ON OR BEFORE 8/4/20 17; WE DENY THE MOTION AS TO THE TILE VI CLAIM; AND, ABSENT PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER PARAGRAPH 1, DEFENDANT SHALL FILE AN ANSWER ON OR BEFORE 8/8/2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 7/25/17. 7/25/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SATELL v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEPHEN SATELL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
Represented By:	NEIL J. HAMBURG
Represented By:	CHRISTA FRANK HIGH
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?