SARAVANAN v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY

SARAVANAN v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY

Plaintiff:	KARTHIK SARAVANAN
Defendant:	DREXEL UNIVERSITY
Case Number:	2:2017cv03409
Filed:	July 31, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	MARK A. KEARNEY
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 24, 2017	Filing 18 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 15 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S ERRONEOUS OUTCOME THEORY BASED ON GENDER BIAS UNDER TITLE IX AND HIS BREACH OF CONTACT AND DECEP TIVE TRADE PRACTICES CLAIMS WITH DEFENDANTS ANSWERING THESE REMAINING CLAIMS NO LATER THAN 12/8/2017. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING THEORIES UNDER TITLE IX AND HIS TITLE VI AND SECTION 1981 CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 11/24/2017. 11/24/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
October 10, 2017	Filing 13 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS(DOC. 7 ) IS GRANTED AND COUNTS VII, IX AND X ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE UPON CONSENT AND THE REMAINDER OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 10/10/2017. 10/10/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Date Filed

Document Text

November 24, 2017

Filing 18 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 15 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S ERRONEOUS OUTCOME THEORY BASED ON GENDER BIAS UNDER TITLE IX AND HIS BREACH OF CONTACT AND DECEP TIVE TRADE PRACTICES CLAIMS WITH DEFENDANTS ANSWERING THESE REMAINING CLAIMS NO LATER THAN 12/8/2017. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING THEORIES UNDER TITLE IX AND HIS TITLE VI AND SECTION 1981 CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 11/24/2017. 11/24/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

October 10, 2017

Filing 13 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS(DOC. 7 ) IS GRANTED AND COUNTS VII, IX AND X ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE UPON CONSENT AND THE REMAINDER OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 10/10/2017. 10/10/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SARAVANAN v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KARTHIK SARAVANAN
Represented By:	RAUL I. JAUREGUI
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DREXEL UNIVERSITY
Represented By:	HEDYA ARYANI
Represented By:	MICHAEL E. BAUGHMAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?