BENJAMIN v. BENJAMIN
Plaintiff: LEVI BENJAMIN
Defendant: LYDIA BENJAMIN
Case Number: 2:2017cv03666
Filed: August 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: MARK A. KEARNEY
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S UNCONTESTED MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS AMENDING THE COMPLAINT AGAINST THIS DEFENDANT BASED ON HER CONDUCT IN AN ONGOING STATE COURT DIVORCE PROCEEDING IS FUTILE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 9/25/17. 9/25/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BENJAMIN v. BENJAMIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEVI BENJAMIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LYDIA BENJAMIN
Represented By: RICHARD J. FRIEDMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?