GARDNER v. SEPTA
Plaintiff: ROBERT GARDNER
Defendant: SEPTA
Case Number: 2:2017cv04476
Filed: October 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER: THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 40) IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS MATER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 10/17/2019. 10/17/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sme, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GARDNER v. SEPTA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT GARDNER
Represented By: OLUGBENGA O. ABIONA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SEPTA
Represented By: DANIELLE BANKS
Represented By: ELIZABETH ASHLEY KUSCHEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?