DECKARD v. ESTATE OF KATHLEEN EMORY et al
| WILLIAM DECKARD, SR. |
| ESTATE OF KATHLEEN EMORY, STEVEN EMORY, JANE'S AND JOHN'S DOE 1 THROUGH 24 and SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP('S), PARTNERSHIP('S), CORPORATION('S), LLC('C) AND LLP('S) 1 THROUGH 18 |
| 2:2017cv05182 |
| November 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Bucks |
| JAN E. DUBOIS |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 13) IS GRANTED. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFTS PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INS. CO., MICHAEL DANILLA, & PENN NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO. IN THE 2ND AMENDE D COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFT CITIZENS BANK, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 27) IS GRANTED. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFT CITIZENS BANK ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFT WORLDPAY'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 40) IS GRANTED. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFT WORLDPAY ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. THE ACLAIM DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 48) IS GRANTED. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFTS ACLAIM ADJUSTMENT AGENCY, INC. & GEORGE PAGANO ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 7/13/20. 7/14/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
