MATTHEWS v. BIOTELEMETRY, INC.

Plaintiff: WILLIAM MATTHEWS
Defendant: BIOTELEMETRY, INC.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00561
Filed: February 9, 2018
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 31, 2018 16 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT (DOC. 10) IS GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH LEAVE TO AMEND WITHIN 14 DAYS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/31/18. 8/1/18 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MATTHEWS v. BIOTELEMETRY, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MATTHEWS
Represented By: MICHAEL GROH
Represented By: MICHAEL PATRICK MURPHY, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BIOTELEMETRY, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?