SOLKOFF v. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff: JOEL SOLKOFF
Defendant: THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Case Number: 2:2018cv00683
Filed: February 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Centre
Presiding Judge: EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER THAT THE JOINT MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 39 IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM 40 . SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 01/23/20. 01/23/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nds)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SOLKOFF v. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOEL SOLKOFF
Represented By: ADAM HARRISON GARNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?