LOWMAN v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: THOMAS M. LOWMAN
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Case Number: 2:2018cv01113
Filed: March 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDERD THAT THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO REMOVE THE CASE FROM CIVIL SUSPENSE; THE R&R IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AND PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED; AND THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONR FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 4/24/19. 4/26/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LOWMAN v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS M. LOWMAN
Represented By: SHARON GORNSTEIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?